Nature


Main page | Jari's writings | Other languages

This is a machine translation made by Google Translate and has not been checked. There may be errors in the text.

   On the right, there are more links to translations made by Google Translate.

   In addition, you can read other articles in your own language when you go to my English website (Jari's writings), select an article there and transfer its web address to Google Translate (https://translate.google.com/?sl=en&tl=fi&op=websites).

                                                            

 

 

Kristian rilijɔn ɛn sayɛns

 

 

Yu tink se Kristian fet dɔn ambɔg sayɛns ɔ i dɔn mek sayɛns go bifo? Rid di pruf dɛn!

                                                                                                                  

Di tɔpik fɔ dis atikul na Kristian fet ɛn sayɛns. Aw di Kristian fet dɔn afɛkt sayɛns ɛn di we aw i de go bifo? Yu tink se i dɔn mek sayɛns nɔ go bifo ɔ i dɔn mek sayɛns go bifo? If na tru di sɛkyula midia ɛn di tin dɛn we sayɛnsman dɛn we nɔ biliv se Gɔd de rayt nɔmɔ dɛn de chɛk dis kwɛstyɔn, bɔku tɛm dɛn kin mek pipul dɛn tink bɔt di prɔblɛm we de bitwin fet ɛn sayɛns. Dɛn kin tink se fet pan Gɔd ɛn sayɛns de agens dɛnsɛf ɛn di fet we Kristian dɛn gɛt dɔn mek sayɛns nɔ go bifo. Insay dis aidia, dɛn se sayɛns bin gɛt pawa na Gris ɛn i bin jɔs go bifo bak we, insay di Enlaytmɛnt, i bin kɔmɔt nia di rilijɔn fɔ rivyu ɛn bigin fɔ abop pan rizin ɛn wach. Di impɔtants fɔ Darwin mɔ, dɛn kin tek am se i impɔtant fɔ di las win we di sayɛnsman dɛn we de si di wɔl dɔn win.

    Bɔt wetin na di tru tin bɔt di tin? Di men tin we Kristian dɛn biliv nɔ ɛva bi sayɛns ɛn fɔ du sayɛns, bɔt na fɔ biliv se Gɔd ɛn Jizɔs Krays de, we dɛn go yuz fɔ fɔgiv ɔlman fɔ in sin dɛn. Bɔt dis nɔ min se di Kristian fet nɔ afɛkt sayɛns ɛn di divɛlɔpmɛnt na di sosayti. Bifo dat, di impɔtant tin we Jizɔs gɛt ɛn di Kristian fet dɔn mek sayɛns bɔn ɛn go bifo. Dis we aw pipul dɛn de si tin kɔmɔt frɔm sɔm pɔynt dɛn, we wi go go tru insay di wan dɛn we de kam. Wi kin bigin wit langwej ɛn fɔ rid ɛn rayt.

 

Literacy: dikshɔnari, grama, alfabɛt. Fɔs, di bɔn fɔ buk langwej ɛn fɔ lan buk. Ɔlman ɔndastand se if neshɔn nɔ gɛt in yon litrɛri langwej ɛn pipul dɛn nɔ ebul fɔ rid, na tin we de ambɔg di divɛlɔpmɛnt fɔ sayɛns, risach, fɔ bɔn tin dɛn we dɛn mek ɛn fɔ mek pipul dɛn no bɔt tin dɛn. Dɔn buk nɔ de, yu nɔ go ebul fɔ rid am, ɛn no nɔ de skata. Sosayti stil de na wan stej we nɔ de chenj.

   So aw di Kristian fet dɔn afɛkt di we aw pipul dɛn de mek langwej dɛn fɔ rayt buk ɛn fɔ lan buk? Dis na di say we bɔku pipul dɛn we de du risach kin gɛt blaynd ples. Dɛn nɔ no se na Kristian dɛn we de wɔship Gɔd mek klos to ɔl di langwej dɛn we dɛn de yuz fɔ rayt buk. Fɔ ɛgzampul, na ya na Finland, Maykɛl Agrikola, we na Finnish rilijɔn rifɔma ɛn papa fɔ buk, bin print di fɔs ABC buk ɛn di Nyu Tɛstamɛnt ɛn sɔm pat dɛn pan ɔda buk dɛn na di Baybul. Di pipul dɛn lan fɔ rid tru dɛn.

    Insay Jamani, Mati Luta bin du di sem tin. I translet di Baybul insay Jaman wit in yon langwej. Dɛn bin mek bɔku bɔku edishɔn dɛn fɔ in transleshɔn ɛn di langwej we Luther bin de yuz bin kam fɔ bi langwej we dɛn de yuz fɔ rayt buk dɛn bitwin Jamani pipul dɛn.

    Wetin wi go se bɔt Ingland? Wiliam Tindel, we translet di Baybul insay Inglish, bin ple impɔtant pat pan dat. Di transleshɔn we Tyndale bin translet bin mek dɛn bɔn di Inglish langwej tide. Bays pan di transleshɔn we Tyndale bin translet, leta dɛn mek di King James transleshɔn, we na di Inglish transleshɔn we pipul dɛn sabi pas ɔl.

   Wan ɛgzampul na di lɛta dɛn we di Slavik pipul dɛn bin rayt, we dɛn kɔl di Sirilik alfabɛt. Dɛn gi dɛn nem to Sɛnt Sayril, we na bin mishɔnari bitwin di Slav dɛn ɛn i bin notis se dɛn nɔ gɛt ɛni alifbɛt. Sayril bin mek di alifbɛt fɔ dɛn so dat dɛn go ebul fɔ rid di Gud Nyus bɔt Jizɔs.

   Bifo dɛn bɔn di ebul fɔ rid, so di langwej we dɛn de rayt fɔ de. Insay dis we, Kristian mishɔnari dɛn dɔn ple wan impɔtant pat, nɔto jɔs bɔku bɔku ia bifo dis tɛm na Wɛstinian kɔntri dɛn, bɔt na Afrika ɛn Eshia leta. Sɔntɛm mishɔnari dɛn dɔn wok fɔ lɔng lɔng tɛm fɔ du risach bɔt langwej. Na dɛn mek di fɔs grama, dikshɔnari ɛn alfabɛt.

   Wan pan dɛn pipul dɛn de na di Mɛtɔdis mishɔnari we nem Frank Laubach, we bin bigin wan kampen fɔ mek pipul dɛn sabi rid ɛn rayt ɔlsay na di wɔl. I bin inflɔws di divɛlɔpmɛnt fɔ ABC-buk dɛn insay 313 langwej dɛn. Dɛn dɔn pik am fɔ bi di apɔsul fɔ di wan dɛn we nɔ sabi rid ɛn rayt.

    Di ɛgzampul dɛn we de kam biɛn ya de tɔk bɔt di sem tin, we na di divɛlɔpmɛnt fɔ langwej dɛn. I impɔtant fɔ no se ivin langwej dɛn lɛk Hindi, we na di men langwej na India, Urdu na Pakistan, ɛn Bɛngali na Bangladɛsh gɛt dɛn grama ɛn langwej baysis pan Kristian mishɔn. Bɔku bɔku pipul dɛn de tɔk ɛn yuz dɛn langwej dɛn ya.

 

Vishal Mangalwadi: A bin gro ɔp na di at fɔ Indu langwej na Allahabad, we de nia 80 kilomita frɔm Kashi, usay Tulsidas bin rayt Ramcharitmanasin , we na di rilijɔn epik we impɔtant pas ɔl na Nɔtan India. Dɛn bin de tɛl mi ɔltɛm se Hindi kɔmɔt frɔm dis big big epik. Bɔt we a rid am, a kɔnfyus, bikɔs a nɔ bin ebul fɔ ɔndastand wan wɔd frɔm am. Di rayta in “Hindi” bin rili difrɛn frɔm mi yon ɛn a bigin fɔ aks kwɛstyɔn, usay mi mama langwej – di ɔfishal nashɔnal langwej na India – kɔmɔt.

... Indu masta sabi bukman dɛn bak nɔ bin divɛlɔp di nashɔnal langwej na India, we na Hindi. Na bikɔs di Baybul transletɔ dɛn lɛk Jɔn Bɔtwik Gilkrist ɛn mishɔnari langwej masta sabi bukman dɛn lɛk Rɛv.

... Baybul transletɔ ɛn mishɔnari dɛn bin gi mɔ pas mi mama langwej Hindi. Ɔl di liv litrɛri langwej dɛn na India de tɛstify dɛn wok. Insay 2005, Dɔktɔ Babu Verghese, we na wan risachman we kɔmɔt na Mɔmbay bɔt we sabi tɔk Malayalam, bin sɛn wan 700 pej dɔktɔ diserteshɔn to Nagpur Yunivasiti fɔ mek dɛn rivyu am. I sho se Baybul transletɔ dɛn mek di 73 langwej dɛn we dɛn de yuz fɔ rayt tide frɔm di langwej dɛn we bɔku pan di Indian dɛn we nɔ sabi rid ɛn rayt de tɔk. Dɛn langwej dɛn ya na di ɔfishal nashɔnal langwej dɛn na India (Hindi), Pakistan (Urdu) ɛn Bangladɛsh (Bɛngali). Fayv Bramine masta sabi bukman dɛn bin stɔdi Verghes in dɔktɔral diserteshɔn ɛn gi am di taytul fɔ Dɔkta fɔ Filɔsofi insay 2008. Na di sem tɛm, dɛn ɔl gri se, afta dɛn dɔn pablish di diserteshɔn, dɛn fɔ adopt di diserteshɔn as buk we dɛn fɔ yuz fɔ stɔdi Indian langwej. (1) .

 

Kristian mishɔnari wok dɔn ɔlwayz de du bɔku tin fɔ ɛp pipul dɛn, so i dɔn rich fɔ ɛp di wan dɛn we sik, di wan dɛn we gɛt disabled, di wan dɛn we angri, di wan dɛn we nɔ gɛt os ɛn di wan dɛn we dɛn de trit bad. Insay bɔku kɔntri dɛn na Afrika, Kristian mishɔnari dɛn dɔn bil di fawndeshɔn fɔ di wan ol skul sistɛm pan tin dɛn we gɛt fɔ du wit bɛsik ɛn wok. Semweso, di mishɔn dɔn kɔntribyut insay wan impɔtant we fɔ mek dɛn mek di wɛlbɔdi biznɛs nɛtwɔk... Wan Afrikan risachman we bɔku pipul dɛn sabi, Yel Yunivasiti prɔfɛsɔ Lamin Sanneh dɔn tɔk se na Afrika, di mishɔnari dɛn dɔn du di big savis to di lokal kɔlchɔ dɛn bay we de mek di bies fɔ di langwej we dɛn rayt. (2) .

 

Literacy projɛkt ɛn litrɛcha. As wi bin dɔn tɔk, bɔku langwej dɛn dɔn gɛt dɛn grama ɛn buk dɛn frɔm di we aw di Kristian fet dɔn afɛkt dɛn. Di wan dɛn we nɔ biliv se Gɔd de ɛn di stet dɛn nɔto bin di wan dɛn we bigin dis divɛlɔpmɛnt, bɔt na dɛn bin de ripresent di Kristian fet. Di divɛlɔpmɛnt fɔ sosayti dɛn bin fɔ dɔn delay fɔ lɔng lɔng tɛm if dɛn nɔ bin gɛt fet pan Gɔd ɛn Jizɔs.

    Dis eria inklud di wok dɛn we dɛn de du fɔ lan buk ɛn rayt na Yurop ɛn ɔda pat dɛn na di wɔl. Tru dɛn, pipul dɛn kin lan fɔ rid di Baybul ɛn ɔda buk dɛn ɛn lan nyu tin dɛn. If yu nɔ sabi rid ɛn rayt, i nɔ kin izi fɔ lan nyu tin dɛn we ɔda pipul dɛn dɔn rayt bɔt.

    We di Kristian fet dɔn win di fil tru mishɔnari wok, i dɔn mek bak di soshal sityueshɔn ɛn stej fɔ bɔku neshɔn dɛn bɛtɛ. Dɛn kayn tin ya na bɛtɛ wɛlbɔdi sityueshɔn, bɛtɛ ikɔmi, mɔ stebul soshal sityueshɔn, lɔw kɔrɔpshɔn ɛn pikin dɛn we de day ɛn, fɔ tru, bɛtɛ litrecha. If no mishɔnari wok ɛn Kristian fet nɔ bin de, bɔku mɔ sɔfa ɛn po bin fɔ de na di wɔl ɛn pipul dɛn nɔ bin fɔ no aw fɔ rid. Pan ɔda tin dɛn, Rɔbɔt Wudbɛri, we na ɛstɛt prɔfɛsɔ na di Yunivasiti ɔf Tɛksas, dɔn si di kɔnekshɔn bitwin mishɔnari wok ɛn dimokrasi, di we aw pipul dɛn de bɛtɛ ɛn di we aw dɛn sabi rid ɛn rayt:

   

Sayɛnsman: Mishɔnari wok bin mek dimokrasi bigin

 

Akɔdin to Rɔbɔt Wudbɛri, we na di ɛstɛt prɔfɛsɔ na Tɛksas Yunivasiti, di impak we di Protɛstant dɛn mishɔnari wok bin gɛt insay di ia 1800 ɛn di biginin fɔ di ia 1900 pan di divɛlɔpmɛnt fɔ dimokrasi dɔn rili impɔtant pas aw dɛn bin de tink fɔs. Bifo dɛn gɛt smɔl pat pan di divɛlɔpmɛnt fɔ dimokrasi, mishɔnari dɛn bin gɛt bɔku pat pan am na bɔku kɔntri dɛn na Afrika ɛn Eshia. Di magazin we dɛn kɔl Christianity Today tɔk bɔt dis.

Rɔbɔt Wudbɛri dɔn stɔdi bɔt di rilayshɔn bitwin mishɔnari wok ɛn di tin dɛn we de afɛkt dimokrasi fɔ lɛk 15 ia so. Akɔdin to am, na de Protɛstant mishɔnari dɛn dɔn gɛt men pawa. Na de di ikɔmi dɔn divɛlɔp mɔ tide ɛn di wɛlbɔdi sityueshɔn rili bɛtɛ pas di eria dɛn, usay mishɔnari dɛn inflɔwɛns dɔn smɔl ɔ nɔ de. Insay di eria dɛn we gɛt bɔku mishɔnari istri, di nɔmba fɔ pikin dɛn we de day nɔ bɔku naw, kɔrɔpshɔn nɔ bɔku, pipul dɛn sabi rid ɛn rayt ɛn i izi fɔ go lan buk, mɔ fɔ uman dɛn.

   Rɔbɔt Wudbɛri bin tɔk se na di Kristian dɛn we bin de mek di Protɛstant rivayval bin rili ɛp dɛn. Difrɛn frɔm dat, di bigman dɛn pan Gɔd biznɛs ɔ di Katolik mishɔnari dɛn we bin de wok na di gɔvmɛnt bifo di ia 1960 nɔ bin gɛt di sem kayn pawa. (3) .

 

Wan gud ɛgzampul bɔt aw di Kristian fet dɔn afɛkt pipul dɛn we sabi rid ɛn rayt ɛn buk na dat, na arawnd di ia 1900, di sɛkyula buk dɛn bin pas di spiritual buk dɛn we dɛn bin de sɛl. Di Baybul ɛn di tin dɛn we i de tich bin de na impɔtant pozishɔn fɔ lɔng lɔng tɛm, te insay di las ɔndrɛd ia i nɔ bin impɔtant igen mɔ ɛn mɔ na di Wɛstinian kɔntri dɛn. Yu tink se na bay chans se insay di sem ia 2000, we dɛn bin lɛf fɔ biliv Kristian, dɛn bin fɛt di big big wɔ dɛn we dɛn bin dɔn fɛt?

    Wan ɔda ɛgzampul na Ingland, we na bin di kɔntri we bin de divɛlɔp pas ɔl di ɔda kɔntri dɛn na di wɔl insay di ia 1900 ɛn 1900. Bɔt wetin bin de biɛn di gud divɛlɔpmɛnt we Ingland bin gɛt? Fɔ tru, wan tin we bin mek pipul dɛn gɛt layf bak na Gɔd in yay usay pipul dɛn bin de tɔn to Gɔd. Bɔku gud tin dɛn bin apin bikɔs ɔf dat, lɛk fɔ lan buk, fɔ pul slev wok, ɛn fɔ mek di po pipul dɛn ɛn di wan dɛn we de wok de go bifo.

   Jɔn Wɛsli, we dɛn sabi as di impɔtant pricha fɔ di Mɛtɔdis muvmɛnt ɛn we di big big rivayval dɛn bin yuz fɔ kam na Ingland insay di 18t sɛntinari, bin rili afɛkt dis divɛlɔpmɛnt. Dɛn dɔn se tru in wok Ingland bin sev frɔm di sem kayn rivɔlɔshɔn we bin apin na Frans. Bɔt Wesli ɛn in kɔmpin dɛn bin ɛp bak fɔ mek Inglish pipul dɛn ebul fɔ gɛt buk ɛn magazin dɛn. Di Encyclopedia Britannica tɔk bɔt Wesley pan dis se "nɔbɔdi nɔ bin du ɔda tin insay di 18th sɛntinari fɔ mek pipul dɛn rid gud buk dɛn, ɛn i bin briŋ bɔku buk dɛn we di pipul dɛn bin ebul fɔ rich pan so smɔl prayz"...

    Insay Ingland, bikɔs ɔf di rivayval, dɛn bɔn Sɔnde skul wok bak insay di 18t sɛntinari. Arawnd 1830, na lɛk wan pat pan di 1.25 milyɔn pikin dɛn na Ingland bin go na Sɔnde skul, usay dɛn bin lan fɔ rid ɛn rayt. Ingland bin de bi sosayti we sabi rid ɛn rayt we Gɔd in Wɔd de tich; di stet nɔ bin inflɔws am.

    Wetin wi go se bɔt Amɛrika? Di kot we de kam biɛn dis wan de tɔk bɔt dis. Na Jɔn Duy (1859-1952) bin tɔk am, ɛn insɛf bin rili afɛkt di we aw pipul dɛn bin de du ɛdyukeshɔn na Amɛrika fɔ mek pipul dɛn nɔ gɛt wanwɔd. Bɔt i ɛksplen aw di Kristian fet dɔn gɛt fayn ifɛkt pan ɛgz., fɔ pɔpul ɛdyukeshɔn ɛn fɔ pul slev wok na in kɔntri:

 

Dɛn pipul ya (ivanjelikal Kristian dɛm) na di bakbon fɔ sɔshal filantrɔpi, pɔlitikal aktiviti we dɛn aim fɔ soshal rifɔm, pasifism ɛn pɔblik ɛdyukeshɔn. Dɛn de ɛmbodi ɛn sho se dɛn de du gud to di wan dɛn we gɛt prɔblɛm wit ikɔnomi ɛn ɔda pipul dɛn, mɔ we dɛn sho ivin di smɔl intres pan wan ripɔblikan fɔm fɔ gɔvmɛnt - - Dis pat pan di pipul dɛn dɔn ansa fayn to di dimand fɔ mek dɛn trit dɛn fayn ɛn fɔ mek dɛn sheb di ikwal tin dɛn we ikwal di chans dɛn we dɛn gɛt insay di layt fɔ dɛn yon kɔnsɛpshɔn fɔ ikwal. I bin fala Linkɔn in fut step fɔ pul slev wok ɛn i gri wit Ruzvelt in aidia dɛn we i kɔndɛm di "ivil" kɔpɔreshɔn dɛn ɛn di we aw dɛn gɛda jɛntri na di smɔl pipul dɛn an. (4) .

 

Yunivasiti dɛn. Bifo dis tɛm, dɛn bin tɔk bɔt aw di Kristian fet dɔn afɛkt di we aw pipul dɛn de mek langwej dɛn we dɛn de rayt ɛn fɔ rid ɛn rayt insay di ia dɛn we dɔn pas ɛn naw. Fɔ ɛgzampul, na Afrika kɔntri dɛn, di bies fɔ di skul sistɛm pan tin dɛn we gɛt fɔ du wit besik ɛn wok edyukeshɔn, na frɔm di inflɛns we Kristian mishɔn dɛn gɛt, ɛn na so bak na di wɛlbɔdi biznɛs. If di Kristian fet nɔ bin gɛt pawa, di divɛlɔpmɛnt fɔ di sosayti dɛn bin fɔ dɔn delay fɔ lɔng lɔng tɛm.

   Wan eria na yunivasiti ɛn skul dɛn. Apat frɔm di litrecha, dɛn impɔtant fɔ di divɛlɔpmɛnt fɔ sayɛns, risach, fɔ bɔn invinshɔn ɛn fɔ spre infɔmeshɔn. Tru dɛn, di no ɛn risach de go bifo to nyu lɛvul.

   Aw di Kristian fet dɔn afɛkt dis eria? Bɔku tɛm, pipul dɛn we nɔ biliv se Gɔd de ɛn we nɔ biliv se Gɔd de, nɔ kin no se di Baybul ɛn di Kristian fet dɔn rili ɛp fɔ du dis. Bɔku bɔku yunivasiti dɛn ɛn tɛn tawzin skul dɛn na Kristian dɛn we de wɔship Gɔd ɔ tru mishɔnari wok dɔn bigin. Dɛn nɔ bɔn dɛn pan pipul dɛn we nɔ biliv se Gɔd de, bikɔs dɛn nɔ bin gɛt yunivasiti dɛn we nɔ gɛt wanwɔd ɛn we di gɔvmɛnt de rul. Fɔ ɛgzampul, pipul dɛn sabi dɛn yunivasiti ya na Ingland ɛn Amɛrika:

- Ɔkford ɛn Kembrij. Dɛn tu siti dɛn ya gɛt bɔku chɔch dɛn ɛn chapel dɛn. Fɔs, dɛn bin mek dɛn yunivasiti ya fɔ tich di Baybul.

- Havad. Dɛn gi dis yunivasiti in nem to Rɛvɛnd Jɔn Havad. I moto frɔm 1692 na Veritas Christo et Ecclesiae (tru fɔ Krays ɛn di Chɔch) .

- Na wan fɔma Havad studɛnt, Puritan prist Kɔtɔn Mather, bin bil Yale Yunivasiti.

- Di fɔs prɛsidɛnt fɔ Prinstɔŋ Yunivasiti (we dɛn bin de kɔl di Kɔlejɔ fɔ Nyu Jɛsi fɔs) na bin Jonathan Edwards, we pipul dɛn sabi fɔ di big big rivayval na Amɛrika insay di 18th sɛntinari. Na in na bin di pricha we bɔku pipul dɛn sabi fɔ prich bɔt dis rivayval, wit Jɔj Waitfild.

- Yunivasiti ɔf Pɛnsilvenia. Jɔj Waitfild, we na wan ɔda lida fɔ di Gret Awakening, bin mek di skul we leta bi di Yunivasiti ɔf Pɛnsilvenia. Waitfild na bin wan pɔb-kipa in pikin ɛn i bin de wok wit Jɔn Wɛsli we wi bin dɔn tɔk bɔt we i bin de na Ingland. I bin gɛt fayn fayn vɔys we nɔ kɔmɔn, we de mek pɔsin yɛri ɛn we gɛt pawa, so dat i bin ebul fɔ tɔk to bɔku bɔku pipul dɛn we dɛn kin yɛri na mitin dɛn we dɛn kin gɛt na do. I bin ebul fɔ prich bak wit kray wata bikɔs Gɔd bin dɔn sɔri fɔ am fɔ pipul dɛn

   Wetin wi go se bɔt India? Dɛn nɔ no India fɔ in Kristian rilijɔn. Bɔt na dis kɔntri, jɔs lɛk na Afrika, bɔku bɔku skul dɛn de we dɛn dɔn bɔn bikɔs ɔf di Kristian fet. Dɛn bɔn di fɔs yunivasiti dɛn na India bak pan di sem we. Bɔku pipul dɛn sabi yunivasiti dɛn lɛk di yunivasiti na Kalkata, Madras, Bɔmbay ɛn Sɛrampo. Apat frɔm dat, bɔku pipul dɛn sabi di Yunivasiti na Allahabad we dɛn bin mek insay 1887. Fayv pan di fɔs sɛvin Praymɛnt Minista dɛn na India kɔmɔt na dis siti, ɛn bɔku pan di administreshɔn na India dɔn stɔdi na di Yunivasiti na Allahabad.

 

Wan rivɔlɔshɔn pan sayɛns. Di atikul bigin frɔm di we aw pipul dɛn we nɔ biliv se Gɔd de, lɛk se di Kristian fet dɔn de ambɔg di divɛlɔpmɛnt fɔ sayɛns. Bɔt i izi fɔ aks kwɛstyɔn bɔt dis we aw pipul dɛn de tink, bikɔs bɔku pan di langwej dɛn we pipul dɛn kin tɔk, fɔ lan buk ɛn yunivasiti dɛn dɔn bɔn frɔm di pawa we di Kristian fet gɛt.

    Wetin wi go se bɔt di tin we dɛn kɔl sayɛns rivɔlɔshɔn? Bɔku tɛm, pipul dɛn we nɔ biliv se Gɔd de ɛn pipul dɛn we nɔ biliv se Gɔd de, kin tɔk se dis chenj nɔ bin gɛt natin fɔ du wit di Kristian fet, bɔt dɛn kin aks kwɛstyɔn bɔt dis we aw pipul dɛn bin de tink. Bikɔs insay di we aw wi de tɔk tide, na wan tɛm nɔmɔ sayɛns dɔn bigin, dat na, na di Yurop we bin de insay di ia 1600 to di ia 1800, usay Kristian dɛn bin de tink bɔt Gɔd. I nɔ bin bigin insay wan sosayti we nɔ de fala di wɔl, bɔt i bigin mɔ na wan sosayti we di Kristian fet inspɛkt. Klosap ɔl di bigman pan sayɛnsman dɛn bin biliv se Gɔd mek ɔltin. Sɔm pan dɛn na bin Fransis Bekan, Rɔbɔt Boyl, Ayzak Nyutɔn, Jɔhans Kɛpla, Kɔpanikɔs, Galilio Galili, Blɛs Paskal, Maykɛl Fɛrade, Jems Klak Makswɛl, Jɔn Re, Luis Pastɔ, ɛn ɔda wan dɛn.

 

Jɛnɛreshɔn dɛn we de rayt bɔt istri ɛn soshiɔlɔjis dɔn notis se Kristian dɛn, Kristian fet, ɛn Kristian institiushɔn dɛn bin ɛp bɔku difrɛn we dɛn fɔ mek di tichin dɛn, di we aw dɛn de du tin, ɛn di sistɛm dɛn we bin kam fɔ bɔn di mɔdan natura sayɛns(...) Pan ɔl we difrɛn we dɛn de we pipul dɛn de tink di inflɛns we i gɛt, ɔlmost ɔl di wan dɛn we de rayt bɔt istri tide gri se Kristian rilijɔn (Katolik ɛn Protɛstant rilijɔn) bin ɛnkɔrej bɔku pipul dɛn we bin de tink bifo di tɛm we wi de naw fɔ stɔdi di tin dɛn we Gɔd mek di rayt we. Di wan dɛn we de stɔdi bɔt istri dɔn si bak se tin dɛn we dɛn bin dɔn lɛnt frɔm Kristian rilijɔn bin fɛn dɛn we fɔ tɔk bɔt sayɛns ɛn gud tin dɛn bin apin. Sɔm sayɛnsman dɛn kin ivin tɔk se di aidia se di tin dɛn we Gɔd mek de wok akɔdin to sɔm lɔ dɛn, kɔmɔt frɔm Kristian tioloji. (5) .

 

Wetin bin de biɛn di rivɔlɔshɔn pan sayɛns? Wan rizin na bin, lɛk aw wi bin dɔn tɔk ɔp, na di yunivasiti dɛn. Bay 1500, na lɛk siksti pan dɛn bin de na Yurop. Dɛn yunivasiti dɛn ya nɔto bin yunivasiti dɛn we pipul dɛn we de fala di wɔl ɛn di gɔvmɛnt bin de kia fɔ, bɔt dɛn bin kam wit di aktif sɔpɔt we di chɔch we bin de insay di midul ivul bin de gi dɛn, ɛn natura sayɛns risach ɛn astronomi bin ple impɔtant pat pan dɛn. Insay dɛn, bɔku fridɔm bin de fɔ du risach ɛn tɔk bɔt sɔntin, ɛn dɛn bin lɛk am. Dɛn yunivasiti dɛn ya bin gɛt bɔku bɔku studɛnt dɛn, ɛn dɛn bin ɛp fɔ rɛdi di grɔn fɔ di sayɛns rivɔlɔshɔn we go pɔsibul na Yurop insay di ia 1600 to di ia 1800. Dis rivɔlɔshɔn nɔ bin kɔmɔt wantɛm wantɛm, bɔt fayn tin dɛn bin apin bifo am. Ɔda kɔntinɛnt dɛn nɔ bin gɛt di sem bɔku edyukeshɔn ɛn di sem kayn yunivasiti dɛn we dɛn bin gɛt na Yurop, .

 

Di Midul Ij bin mek wan bɛnifit fɔ di big tin we di Wɛstinian sosayti dɔn du: sayɛns tide. Fɔ tɔk se sayɛns nɔ bin de bifo “Renaissance” jɔs nɔto tru. Afta we masta sabi bukman dɛn we bin de insay di Midul Ij bin kam fɔ no bɔt di Grik risach we dɛn bin de du trade trade, dɛn bin mek di we aw pipul dɛn de tink, ɛn dis bin mek sayɛns go fa fawe we dɛn kɔmpia am to di tɛm we dɛn bin de trade trade. Yunivasiti dɛm, usay dɛn bin de protɛkt fridɔm fɔ lan buk frɔm di lida dɛm pawa, dɛn bin bil am insay di 1100 dɛm. Dɛn institiushɔn dɛn ya dɔn de gi sayɛns risach ɔltɛm usay sef. Ivin Kristian tioloji bin pruv se i fit fɔ ɛnkɔrej pipul dɛn fɔ du risach bɔt di tin dɛn we Gɔd mek, we dɛn bin biliv se na Gɔd mek. (6) .

 

Mɛrɛsin ɛn ɔspitul dɛn. Wan tin we di Kristian fet dɔn afɛkt na fɔ mɛn pipul dɛn ɛn fɔ bɔn ɔspitul dɛn. Wan impɔtant pat na bin mɔ di mɔnk dɛn, we bin de kip, kɔpi ɛn translet di ol mɛdikal manuskrip dɛn ɛn ɔda ol ol klasical ɛn sayɛns wok dɛn. Apat frɔm dat, dɛn bin mek mɛrɛsin mɔ. If dɛn nɔ bin de du dɛn wok, mɛrɛsin nɔ bin fɔ dɔn go bifo di sem we, ɛn dɛn nɔ bin fɔ dɔn kip di ol tɛks dɛn we dɛn bin de rayt trade trade fɔ mek di jɛnɛreshɔn dɛn tide rid.

    Heltkeya, soshal wok ɛn bɔku bɔku ɔganayzeshɔn dɛn we de ɛp pipul dɛn (Rɛd Kros, Sev di Pikin dɛn...) na pipul dɛn we se dɛn na Kristian dɔn bigin bak, bikɔs di Kristian fet dɔn ɔlwayz gɛt sɔri-at fɔ pɔsin in neba. Dis kɔmɔt frɔm Jizɔs in tichin ɛn in ɛgzampul. Bifo dat, bɔku tɛm, pipul dɛn we nɔ biliv se Gɔd de ɛn pipul dɛn we lɛk mɔtalman dɔn de wach dis eria. Wan Inglish jɔnalist we nem Malcolm Muggeridge (1903-1990), we insɛf na bin sɛkyula umanist, bɔt pan ɔl dat, i bin ɔnɛs, bin notis dis. I bin pe atɛnshɔn to aw di we aw pipul dɛn de si di wɔl de afɛkt di kɔlchɔ:"A dɔn spɛn bɔku ia na India ɛn Afrika, ɛn insay dɛn tu tin ya a dɔn mit bɔku rayt tin dɛn we Kristian dɛn we de na difrɛn rilijɔn dɛn de mentɛn; bɔt nɔto wan tɛm nɔmɔ a dɔn kam fɔ si ɔspitul ɔ ɔfɛnij we soshialis ɔganayzeshɔn ɔ ples fɔ mɛn pipul dɛn we gɛt lɛprɔsi." we de ɔpreshɔn pan di bies fɔ umanizm." (7) .

   Di kot dɛn we de kam biɛn ya de sho mɔ aw di Kristian fet dɔn afɛkt nɔs ɛn ɔda tin dɛn tru mishɔnari wok. Bɔku ɔspitul dɛn na Afrika ɛn India, dɛn bɔn dɛn tru Kristian mishɔn ɛn di want fɔ ɛp. Bɔku pan di fɔs ɔspitul dɛn na Yurop bak bin kɔmɔt ɔnda di Kristian fet. Gɔd kin mɛn pɔsin dairekt wan, bɔt bɔku pipul dɛn dɔn gɛt ɛp tru mɛrɛsin ɛn ɔspitul. Di Kristian fet dɔn ple impɔtant pat pan dat.

 

Insay di Midul Ij di pipul dɛn, we de na di Ɔda fɔ Sɛnt Bɛndikt, bin de kia fɔ pas tu tawzin ɔspitul dɛn na di Wɛstin Yurop nɔmɔ. Di 12 th sɛntinari bin rili impɔtant pan dis, mɔ de, usay di Ɔda fɔ Sɛnt Jɔn bin de wok. Fɔ ɛgzampul, dɛn bin bil di big Ospital fɔ di Oli Spirit insay 1145 na Mɔntpɛli, we kwik kwik wan bin bi di sɛnta fɔ mɛdikal ɛdyukeshɔn ɛn di mɛdikal sɛntal na Mɔntpɛli insay di ia 1221. Apat frɔm di mɛrɛsin, dɛn ɔspitul ya bin de gi tin fɔ it to di wan dɛn we angri ɛn bin de kia fɔ uman dɛn we dɛn man dɔn day ɛn pikin dɛn we nɔ gɛt mama ɛn papa, ɛn gi gift to di wan dɛn we nid dɛn. (8) .

 

Pan ɔl we pipul dɛn dɔn de kɔndɛm di Kristian chɔch bɔku tɛm insay in istri, i stil bi di fɔs pɔsin we de bifo pan mɛrɛsin fɔ di po pipul dɛn, fɔ ɛp pipul dɛn we dɛn kapchɔ, pipul dɛn we nɔ gɛt os ɔ di wan dɛn we de day ɛn fɔ mek di say dɛn we dɛn de wok bɛtɛ. Insay India di bɛst ɔspitul ɛn ɛdyukeshɔn institiushɔn dɛn we gɛt fɔ du wit am na di rizɔlt fɔ Kristian mishɔnari wok, ivin te bɔku Indu dɛn de yuz dɛn ɔspitul ya pas di ɔspitul dɛn we di gɔvmɛnt de kia fɔ, bikɔs dɛn no se dɛn go gɛt bɛtɛ kia pas dɛn de. Dɛn se we di Sɛkɔn Wɔl Wɔ bigin, 90% pan di nɔs dɛn na India na bin Kristian, ɛn 80% pan dɛn bin gɛt dɛn edyukeshɔn na mishɔnari ɔspitul dɛn. (9) .

 

Insay chɔch, dɛn bin de tek kia ɔf di tin dɛn we de apin na dis layf jɔs lɛk aw dɛn bin de tek kia ɔf di tin dɛn we go apin tumara bambay; i bin tan lɛk se ɔl wetin di Afrikan dɛn bin de du, kɔmɔt frɔm di mishɔnari wok we di chɔch bin de du. (Nɛlsin Mandela insay in buk we i rayt bɔt in layf we nem Long Walk to Freedom)

 

Yu tink se di chɔch bin de mek sayɛnsman dɛn sɔfa? As wi bin dɔn tɔk, di Kristian fet bin rili afɛkt di tɛm we dɛn bɔn di sayɛns rivɔlɔshɔn. Wan rizin fɔ dis na di yunivasiti dɛn we di chɔch bin mek. So, di tɔk we pipul dɛn we nɔ biliv se Gɔd de lɛk fɔ gɛt, dat na se di Kristian fet fɔ dɔn bi sɔntin we de ambɔg di divɛlɔpmɛnt fɔ sayɛns, na big lay lay stori. Dis de sho bak di tru tin we se di kɔntri dɛn usay Kristian rilijɔn dɔn gɛt pawa fɔ lɔng tɛm pas ɔl na di wan dɛn we de payɔnia pan sayɛns ɛn risach.

    Wetin wi go se bɔt di we aw pipul dɛn bin de tink se di chɔch bin de mek sayɛnsman dɛn sɔfa? Di wan dɛn we nɔ biliv se Gɔd de want fɔ kɔntinyu fɔ tink bɔt dis, bɔt bɔku pipul dɛn we de stɔdi bɔt istri kin tek am se na tin we dɛn dɔn chenj di istri. Dis noshɔn bɔt di kɔnfrɛns bitwin fet ɛn sayɛns jɔs de bak to di ɛnd ɔf di 19th sɛntinari, we rayta dɛm we sɔpɔt Darwin in tiori, ɛgz., Andru Dikson Wait ɛn Jɔn Wiliam Drapa, bin briŋ am kam na dɛn buk dɛm. Bɔt, ɛgz., wan mɛdival risachman Jems Hannam dɔn tɔk se:

 

Difrɛn frɔm wetin pipul dɛn biliv, chɔch nɔ ɛva sɔpɔt di aidia fɔ mek flat wɔl, dɛn nɔ ɛva nɔ gri fɔ mek dɛn du ɔtopsi, ɛn fɔ tru, dɛn nɔ ɛva bɔn ɛnibɔdi na di tik fɔ dɛn sayɛns aydia. (10) .

 

Wan man we nem Tim O’Neill we kɔmɔt Ɔstrelia we nɔ biliv, dɔn tek wan tin we i tɔk bɔt dis tin ɛn i sho aw smɔl pipul dɛn rili no bɔt istri: "I no at to kik dis bullshit to pies, espeshali wen di pipul we de tok abaut am no neks to notin abaut histri. Dem jos pik op dis weird aidia from websait and popular buk. Dis klem de fol apat wen dem hit am." incontrovertible evidence.A fain am fayn fɔ poke fun pan di propagandist dɛm pafɛkt wan bay we a aks dɛm fɔ nem wan - wan nɔmɔ - sayɛnsman we dɛn bin bɔn na tik ɔ we dɛn bin de mek sɔfa ɔ we dɛn bin de mek sɔfa fɔ in risach insay di Midul Ij.Dɛn nɔ go ɛva ebul fɔ nem wan wan ... Na di say we a de list di sayɛnsman dɛn we bin de insay di Midul Ij - Albɛrtɔs Magnɔs, Rɔbɔt Grɔsɛtɛst, Roja Bekan, Jɔn Pɛkam, Duns Skɔtus, Tɔmɔs Bradwɔdin, Walta Bɔli, Wiliam Haytesbɔri, Richad Swinɛshɛd, Jɔn Dambultɔn, Richad we kɔmɔt na Wɔlingfɔd, Nikolas Ɔresmɛ, Jin Buridan, 1999.ɛn Nikolas Kusanɔs—ɛn a de aks wetin mek dɛn man ya wit ɔl pis bin mek di sayɛns we bin de insay di Midul Ij go bifo we di chɔch nɔ bin de ambɔg dɛn, di wan dɛn we bin de agens mi bin de skrach dɛn ed wit sɔprayz, ɛn dɛn bin de wɔnda wetin rili nɔ apin." (11)

   Wetin wi go se bɔt Galilio Galili, we bin tɔn di Grik Tɔlɔmi in mɔdel we bin de na di wɔl fɔ sho se di san de rɔn rawnd di wɔl? Na tru se di Pop bin du bad to am, bɔt di prɔblɛm na fɔ chenj di we aw pipul dɛn de yuz pawa, nɔto fɔ agens sayɛns. (Yɛs, di pop dɛn ɛn di Katolik Chɔch dɔn gilti fɔ bɔku ɔda tin dɛn, lɛk di Kruseyd ɛn di Inkwizishɔn. Bɔt na fɔ lɛf di Kristian fet ɔltogɛda ɔ nɔ fala di tin dɛn we Jizɔs de tich. Bɔku pipul dɛn nɔ ɔndastand dis difrɛn.) I impɔtant bak fɔ no se di wan dɛn we de ripresent sayɛns ɛn fet nɔ bin gɛt wanwɔd pan di we aw dɛn bin de tink bɔt Galio in tiori. Sɔm sayɛnsman dɛn bin de na in say, ɔda wan dɛn bin de agens am. Semweso, sɔm chɔchman dɛn bin de agens wetin i bin de tink, ɔda wan dɛn bin de fɛt fɔ am. Dis kin bi ɔltɛm we nyu tiori dɛn kin kam.

   So wetin mek Galilio nɔ bin lɛk di Pop ɛn put am ɔnda os arɛst na in vilej? Wan rizin na di we aw Galio insɛf bin de biev. Fɔs, di Pop bin rili lɛk Galilio, bɔt di we aw Galilio nɔ bin de tek tɛm rayt bin ɛp fɔ mek di tin dɛn we bin de apin to am mɔ ɛn mɔ. Ari Turunen bin rayt bɔt di bakgrɔn fɔ di tin:

 

Pan ɔl we pipul dɛn kin tek Galilio Galili as wan pan di bigman dɛn we sayɛns dɔn day fɔ dɛn fet, wi fɔ mɛmba se i nɔ bin rili fayn as pɔsin. I bin de prawd ɛn i bin izi fɔ mek i vɛks, i bin de kray bɔku ɛn i nɔ bin gɛt sɛns ɛn talɛnt fɔ handle pipul.Tɛnki fɔ in shap tɔŋ ɛn kɔmɛnt, i nɔ bin gɛt ɛnimi dɛn bak we nɔ bin de. Galio in astronomi wok yuz wan fɔmat fɔ tɔk to pipul dɛn. Di buk introduks wan pɔsin we nɔ gɛt bɛtɛ sɛns we nem Simplicius, we prɛzɛnt Galio wit di mɔs idiotic kɔntra-argumɛnt dɛn. Galilio in ɛnimi dɛn bin ebul fɔ mek di Pop biliv se Galilio bin min di Pop wit in figa we na Simplikɔs. Na afta dis nɔmɔ di vain ɛn sɛnsitiv Urban VIII tek akshɔn agens Galio...

    ...Urbanus bin tek insɛf as pɔsin we de rifɔm ɛn i bin gri fɔ tɔk wit Galio, bɔt Galio in stayl bin tu bɔku fɔ di Pop. Ilɛksɛf Galili bin min di Pop wit in Simplicus figa ɔ nɔto so, di we aw dɛn bin pik di nem bin bad we wi nɔ go ebul fɔ ɔndastand. Galili nɔ bin bisin bɔt di bɛsis tin dɛn fɔ rayt fayn fayn wan, we inklud fɔ rɛspɛkt di pɔsin we de rid. (12) .

 

Ɛn yu tink se pipul dɛn we nɔ biliv se Gɔd de dɔn mek sayɛnsman dɛn sɔfa? At ɔl dis bin apin na di Sɔviɛt Yuniɔn we nɔ bin biliv se Gɔd de, usay dɛn bin put bɔku sayɛnsman dɛn lɛk pipul dɛn we de stɔdi bɔt dɛn jɛnɛtiks, na jel ɛn dɛn bin kil sɔm bikɔs dɛn bin de tink bɔt sayɛns.

     Semweso, dɛn bin kil bɔku sayɛnsman dɛn insay di Frɛnch Rivɛlushɔn: wan man we nem Antoine Lavoisier we de stɔdi bɔt kemistri, wan man we nem Jean Sylvain Bally we de stɔdi bɔt di sta dɛn, wan man we de stɔdi bɔt di mineral dɛn we nem Philippe-Frédéric de Dietrich, wan man we de stɔdi bɔt di sta dɛn we nem Jean Baptiste Gaspard Bochart de Saron, wan man we sabi bɔt di plant dɛn we nem Chrétien Guillaume de Lamoignon de Malesherbes. Bɔt dɛn nɔ bin kil dɛn fɔ di tin dɛn we dɛn bin de tink bɔt sayɛns, bɔt dɛn bin kil dɛn fɔ di we aw dɛn bin de tink bɔt pɔlitiks. Na ya bak, na bin kes we dɛn bin de yuz di pawa bad bad wan, we bin gɛt difrɛn bad tin dɛn fɔ du frɔm di we aw dɛn bin trit Galio.

 

Di mistek we sayɛns bin de waka: Darwin bin mek sayɛns go na di rɔng rod. Dis atikul bigin frɔm di tin we pipul dɛn we nɔ biliv se Gɔd de, lɛk se di Kristian fet dɔn mek sayɛns nɔ ebul fɔ du mɔ. Dɛn bin tɔk se no rizin nɔ de fɔ dis, bɔt di impɔtant tin we Kristian fet impɔtant dɔn mek sayɛns bɔn ɛn go bifo. Dis we aw pipul dɛn de si tin kɔmɔt frɔm bɔku tin dɛn lɛk di bɔn we dɛn bɔn di langwej dɛn we dɛn de rayt buk, di we aw dɛn sabi rid ɛn rayt, di skul ɛn yunivasiti dɛn, di divɛlɔpmɛnt fɔ mɛrɛsin ɛn ɔspitul dɛn, ɛn di tru tin we se di sayɛns rivɔlɔshɔn bin apin na Yurop insay di ia 1600 to di ia 1800, usay Kristian gɔd dɛn bin de. Dis chenj nɔ bin bigin na wan sosayti we nɔ bin de fala di wɔl, bɔt i bin bigin mɔ na wan sosayti we di Kristian fet bin inspɛkt.

   If di Kristian fet dɔn bi gud tin fɔ mek sayɛns go bifo, usay di aidia fɔ agens sayɛns ɛn Kristian fet kɔmɔt? Wan rizin fɔ dis na fɔ tru na Chals Dawin wit in tiori dɛn bɔt evolushɔn insay di 19t sɛntinari. Dis tiori, we kɔmpitabl wit naturalism, na di men kulprit fɔ dis imej. Di pɔsin we bɔku pipul dɛn sabi we nɔ biliv se Gɔd de, we nem Richad Dɔkins, dɔn tɔk bak se bifo Darwin in tɛm i bin fɔ dɔn at fɔ mek i bi pɔsin we nɔ biliv se Gɔd de: "Pan ɔl we i go tan lɛk se di pipul dɛn we nɔ biliv se Gɔd de, i bin lɔjik wan bifo Darwin, na Darwin nɔmɔ bin mek di fawndeshɔn fɔ di wan dɛn we nɔ biliv se Gɔd de we gɛt sɛns". (13).

   Bɔt bɔt. We sayɛnsman dɛn we de stɔdi bɔt di tin dɛn we Gɔd mek, rɛspɛkt di wok we Darwin de du ɛn di tin dɛn we i de tray fɔ du, sɔm pan dɛn kin rayt, sɔm pat pan dɛn kin rɔng. Dɛn rayt se Darwin na bin pɔsin we sabi bɔt di tin dɛn we Gɔd mek kɔrɛkt wan, i bin lan bɔt in tɔpik ɛn i bin no aw fɔ rayt bɔt in risach. Nɔbɔdi we dɔn rid in magnum opus On the Origin of Species nɔ go dinay dat.

   Bɔt dɛn nɔ rayt fɔ aksept wetin Darwin bin tink se ɔl di spisis dɛn gɛt frɔm wan primordial sɛl (di primordial cell-to-man theory). Di rizin simpul: Darwin nɔ bin ebul fɔ sho ɛni ɛgzampul bɔt di chenj dɛn we de apin na di spisis dɛn na in buk we nem On the Origin of Species, bɔt na ɛgzampul dɛn nɔmɔ bɔt aw dɛn kin chenj ɛn aw dɛn kin adap. Dɛn na tu difrɛn tin dɛn. Difrɛns, lɛk di saiz fɔ di bɔd in mɔt, di saiz fɔ di wing dɛn, ɔ di bɛtɛ we aw sɔm baktri dɛn de fɛt, nɔ de pruv ɛni we se ɔl di kayn bɔd dɛn we de naw kɔmɔt frɔm di sem ɔrijinal sɛl. Di kɔmɛnt dɛn we de dɔŋ ya de tɛl mɔ bɔt di tɔpik. Darwin insɛf bin gɛt fɔ gri se i nɔ bin gɛt ɛni ɛgzampul bɔt rial chenj dɛn na di spisis dɛn. Insay dis we, wi kin se Darwin bin mek sayɛns ful:

 

Darwin: A rili taya fɔ tɛl pipul dɛn se a nɔ de tɔk se a gɛt ɛni dairekt pruf fɔ se wan spisis dɔn chenj to ɔda spisis ɛn a biliv se dis we aw pipul dɛn de si tin kɔrɛkt mɔ bikɔs dɛn kin grup bɔku tin dɛn ɛn ɛksplen dɛn bay we dɛn de yuz am. (14) .

 

Encyclopedia Britannica: Wi fɔ tɔk mɔ se Darwin nɔ ɛva tɔk se i ebul fɔ pruv se evolushɔn ɔ usay di spisis dɛn kɔmɔt. I bin tɔk se if evolushɔn dɔn apin, dɛn kin ɛksplen bɔku tin dɛn we wi nɔ ebul fɔ ɛksplen. So di pruf dɛn we de sɔpɔt evolushɔn nɔ de dairekt wan. 

 

"I rili ironi se buk we dɔn bi fambul fɔ ɛksplen di ɔrijin fɔ di spisis nɔ de ɛksplen am ɛni we." (Christopher Booker, we de rayt bɔt di Times we de tɔk bɔt di magnum opus we Darwin rayt, On the Origin of Species )   (15)

 

If Darwin bin tich di kayn we we insted of wan famili tri (di we aw pipul dɛn de si evolushɔn, we de tek am se di layf we de naw kɔmɔt frɔm di sem fɔs fɔs), bɔku bɔku famili tik dɛn fɔ dɔn de, ɛn ɛni tik gɛt branch dɛn ɛn bifurcations, i bin fɔ dɔn de nia di trut mɔ. Difrɛns kin apin, lɛk aw Darwin bin pruv, bɔt na insay di bɛsis spisis nɔmɔ. di obsכbishכn dεm fit bεtε wit di krieshɔn mכdel pas di mכdel usay di kכrant layf fכm dεm we kכmכt frכm wan singl primordial sεl, dat na wan singl stεm fכm:

 

Wi kin jɔs tɔk bɔt di rizin dɛn we mek sayɛnsman dɛn tek di kɔnsɛpt fɔ wan kɔmɔn gret gret granpa so nɔ kritikal. Wi nɔ gɛt wan dawt fɔ se di win we Darwin rilijɔn bin win bin mek di sayɛnsman dɛn gɛt mɔ rɛspɛkt, ɛn di aidia fɔ mek wan ɔtomɛtik prɔses fit so gud wan wit di spirit we bin de da tɛm de dat di tiori bin ivin gɛt sɔpɔt frɔm di lida dɛn na rilijɔn we bin sɔprayz. Ɛni we aw i bi, sayɛnsman dɛn bin gri wit di tiori bifo dɛn dɔn tɛst am tranga wan, dɔn dɛn yuz dɛn pawa fɔ mek di jenɛral pɔblik biliv se natin nɔ go du fɔ mek mɔtalman kɔmɔt frɔm baktri ɛn baktri frɔm kemikal miksɔp. Sayɛns we de tɔk bɔt aw ɔltin kam bay chans bin bigin fɔ luk fɔ pruf dɛn we go sɔpɔt am ɛn dɛn bigin fɔ kam wit ɛksplen dɛn we go mek di bad pruf dɛn we de na di wɔl nɔ gɛt natin fɔ du wit am. (16) .

 

Di tin dɛn we dɛn rayt bɔt di tin dɛn we dɛn dɔn fɛn, de sho bak se wetin Darwin bin tɔk nɔto tru. dεn bin no fכ lכng tεm se dεn nכ de si divεlכpmεnt sכmtεm na fכs, pan כl we di evolushכn tiori nid fכ kכmכt fכ sεns, כgan dεm εn nyu spεshal tin dεm tru dis. Fɔ ɛgzampul, Stivin M. Stanli dɔn tɔk se: "Nɔto wan ɛgzampul de insay di fɔs tin we dɛn no usay wan impɔtant nyu strɔkchɔral ficha de divɛlɔp fɔ di spisis (17)

    Bɔku big big pipul dɛn we de stɔdi bɔt di tin dɛn we bin dɔn apin trade trade dɔn gri se di divɛlɔpmɛnt nɔ de go bifo smɔl smɔl. Fɔsɛl ɔ di mɔdan spisis nɔ sho ɛgzampul fɔ di divɛlɔpmɛnt smɔl smɔl we Darwin in tiori se. Dis dɔŋ ya na sɔm kɔmɛnt dɛn frɔm di wan dɛn we de ripresent di natura istri myuziɔm dɛn. Natural history museums fɔ gɛt di bɛst pruf fɔ se evolushɔn, bɔt dɛn nɔ de. Fɔs, wan kɔmɛnt we Stivin Jey Gould, we sɔntɛm na di pɔsin we sabi bɔt di tin dɛn we dɔn apin trade trade we pipul dɛn sabi pas ɔlman na wi tɛm (American Museum) bin tɔk. I dinay se di tin dɛn we dɛn dɔn fɛn de gro smɔl smɔl:

 

Stephen Jay Gould: A nɔ want in ɛni we fɔ smɔl di pɔtnɛshɛl kɔmpɛtɛnshɔn fɔ di smol smol evolushɔn we dɛn de si. A wan onli rimark se dem neva ‘observ’ am fo rok.  (Di Panda in Tɔmɔs, 1988, pej 182,183).

 

Dɔktɔ Ɛtirij, we na di wɔl we bɔku pipul dɛn sabi fɔ kia fɔ di British Miusiɔm:  Insay dis wan ol myuziɔm, ivin di smɔl tin nɔ de we go pruv usay difrɛn difrɛn tin dɛn kɔmɔt frɔm difrɛn difrɛn we dɛn. Di tiori bɔt evolushɔn nɔ de bay wetin dɛn dɔn si ɛn di tru tin dɛn. As i kam pan fɔ tɔk bɔt di ej we mɔtalman dɔn ol, di tin we de apin na di sem. Dis myuziɔm ful-ɔp wit pruf we de sho aw dɛn tiori ya nɔ gɛt maynd. (18) .

 

Nɔn pan di ɔfisa dɛn we de na fayv big big myuziɔm dɛn we de stɔdi bɔt di tin dɛn we dɔn apin trade trade nɔ ebul fɔ sho ivin wan simpul ɛgzampul bɔt wan tin we gɛt layf we dɛn kin tek as pruf fɔ sho se i de chenj smɔl smɔl frɔm wan spisis to ɔda wan. (Dɔktɔ Luther Sunderland in sɔmari insay in buk we nem  Darwin’s enigma . I bin intavyu bɔku pipul dɛn we de ripresent di natura istri myuziɔm dɛn fɔ dis buk ɛn rayt to dɛn fɔ no us kayn pruf dɛn gɛt fɔ pruv se ɔltin kam bay chans. [19])

 

The following statement continues on the same subject. The late Dr Colin Patterson was a senior paleontologist and fossil expert at the British Museum (Natural History). He wrote a book about evolution - but when someone asked him why his book didn’t have any pictures of intermediate forms (organisms in transition), he wrote the following answer. In his reply, he refers to Stephen J. Gould, perhaps the most famous paleontologist in the world (bold added):

 

I agree completely with your opinion concerning the lack of illustrations in my book about organisms which are evolutionarily in the transitional stage. If I were conscious of any such, of a fossil or of living, I would have willingly included them in my book. You propose that I should use an artist to illustrate such intermediate forms but from where would he get information for his drawings? Honestly saying, I could not offer him this information, and if I should leave the matter for an artist, would it not lead the reader astray?

   I wrote the text of my book four years ago [in the book he tells that he believes in some intermediate forms]. If I were to write it now, I think that the book would be rather different. Gradualism (changing gradually) is a concept in which I do believe. Not just because of the prestige of Darwin but because my comprehension of the genetics seems to require it. However, it is difficult to claim against [famous fossil expert Stephen J.] Gould and other people of the American museum when they say that there are no intermediate forms. As a palaeontologist, I work much with philosophical problems when recognizing ancient forms of organisms from the fossil material. You say that I should also at least 'present a photo of a fossil, from which the certain organism group evolved.' I speak directly – there is no fossil that would be a watertight piece of evidence. (20)

 

What can be concluded from the above? We can respect Darwin as a good naturalist, but we should not accept his assumption about the inheritance of species from a single primordial cell. The evidence is clearly more suitable for creation so that God immediately made everything ready. Variation does occur, and species can be modified to some extent through breeding, but all this has limits that will soon be reached.

    The conclusion is that Darwin led science astray, and atheist scientists followed him. It is much more reasonable to rely on the historical view that God created everything so that it did not arise by itself. This view is also supported by the fact that scientists do not know the solution to how life could arise by itself. This is understandable because it is an impossibility. Only life can create life, and no exception to this rule has been found. For the first life forms, this clearly refers to God:

 

- (Gen 1:1) In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

 

- (Rom 1:19,20) Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God has showed it to them.

20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

 

- (Rev 4:11) You are worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honor and power: for you have created all things, and for your pleasure they are and were created.

 
 

References:

 

1. Vishal Mangalwadi: Kirja, joka muutti maailmasi (The Book that Made Your World), p. 181,182,186

2. Usko, toivo ja terveys, p. 143, Article by Risto A. Ahonen

3. Matti Korhonen, Uusi tie 6.2.2014, p. 5.

4. John Dewey: ”The American Intellectual Frontier” New Republic, 10.5.1922, vol. 30, p. 303. Republic Publishing 1922

5. Noah J. Efron: Myytti 9: Kristinusko synnytti modernin luonnontieteen, p. 82,83 in book Galileo tyrmässä ja muita myyttejä tieteestä ja uskonnosta (Galileo Goes to Jail and Other Myths about Science and Religion)

6. James Hannam: The Genesis of Science: How the Christian Middle Ages Launched the Scientific Revolution

7. Malcolm Muggeridge: Jesus Rediscovered. Pyramid 1969.

8. David Bentley Hart: Ateismin harhat (Atheist Delusions: The Christian Revolution and its Fashionable Enemies), p. 65

9. Lennart Saari: Haavoittunut planeetta, p. 104

10. James Hannam: The Genesis of Science: How the Christian Middle Ages Launched the Scientific Revolution

11. O'Neill, T., The Dark Age Myth: An atheist reviews God's Philosophers, strangenotions.com, 17 October 2009

12. Ari Turunen: Ei onnistu, p. 201,202

13. Richard Dawkins: Sokea kelloseppä, p. 20

14. Darwin, F & Seward A. C. toim. (1903, 1: 184): More letters of Charles Darwin. 2 vols. London: John Murray.

15. Christopher Booker: “The Evolution of a Theory”, The Star, Johannesburg, 20.4.1982, p. 19

16.  Philip E. Johnson: Darwin on Trial, p. 152

17. Steven M. Stanley: Macroevolution: Pattern and Process. San Francisco: W.M. Freeman and Co. 1979, p. 39

18. Thoralf Gulbrandsen: Puuttuva rengas, p. 94

19. Sit. kirjasta "Taustaa tekijänoikeudesta maailmaan", Kimmo Pälikkö ja Markku Särelä, p. 19.

20. Carl Wieland: Kiviä ja luita (Stones and Bones), p. 15,16

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jesus is the way, the truth and the life

 

 

  

 

Grap to eternal life!

 

Other Google Translate machine translations:

 

 

Milyan ia / dainosaur / mɔtalman evolushɔn?
Distrɔkshɔn fɔ dainosaur dɛn
Sayns in delusion: atheistic tiori dɛm bɔt ɔrijin ɛn bɔku bɔku ia
Ustɛm di dainosaur dɛn bin de liv?

Istri bɔt di Baybul
Di Ebi Ebi Ren

Kristian fet: sayɛns, mɔtalman rayt
Kristian rilijɔn ɛn sayɛns
Kristian fet ɛn mɔtalman rayt

Ist rilijɔn dɛn / Nyu Ij
Buddha, Budis ɔ Jizɔs?
Yu tink se fɔ bɔn bak na tru?

Islam
Muhammad in rivyu ɛn layf
Aydɔl wɔship na Islam ɛn na Mɛkka
Yu tink se pɔsin kin abop pan di Kɔran?

Kwɛstyɔn dɛn we gɛt fɔ du wit ɛtikul
Yu fɔ fri frɔm omoseksualiti
Mared we nɔ gɛt ɛnitin fɔ du wit man ɔ uman
Fɔ pwɛl bɛlɛ na kriminal tin
Yutenayshɔn ɛn sayn dɛn fɔ di tɛm

Fɔ sev pɔsin
Yu kin sev